Folklore, retold
The story as it is told
A retelling, not a citation. What follows is the story as the most widely circulated popular accounts tell it — folklore encyclopedias, translations, and the versions that have travelled furthest. It is synthesized rather than keyed line by line to the dated primary texts, and popular versions drift from what those texts actually say. The cited, source-by-source record begins further down this page, and where the two disagree, the record wins.
A tree that grew on an old battlefield.
It stood there through the fighting and after it, and the ground beneath it was soaked, for years, in blood. And the tree took it up through its roots the way a tree takes up anything in the soil.
Now it thirsts.
When a traveller passes underneath, the branches come down and take hold — and they change, hollowing into tubes, and they drink. What's left is dropped: dry, and light, and quite clean.
And the tree looks completely healthy. That's the detail that finishes it. A jubokko is a fine, vigorous, well-nourished tree, and the reason it looks so well is what it has been drinking.
It's invented
That's a magnificent piece of horror and it was made up in the twentieth century.
The finding here is unusually definitive, which is why this entry is worth having at all.
The great folklore corpora — Yanagita's, and Iwao Hino's — contain no creature that could be the jubokko's origin. Not a thin one, not a regional cousin. Nothing.
And a Japanese scholarly group examining it concluded that there is no source of appearance for this tree at all, and that it can be theorized as a fictional creature conceived by Shigeru Mizuki.
No village believed this. Nobody warned their children about it. It appeared, fully formed and superb, in a modern yokai book.
The bigger problem underneath
Here's why that matters beyond one tree.
Mizuki did not label which of his yokai were his own inventions.
He drew hundreds of creatures. Some were faithfully rendered from thin regional records — real beliefs finally given a body. Some were embroidered. And an estimated thirty or so were invented outright, and went into the same books, in the same style, with the same authority, undifferentiated.
Which means a substantial number of "traditional Japanese yokai" circulating today — in encyclopedias, games, films, tattoo flash, and the confident corner of the internet — came out of one man's imagination in the postwar decades, and nobody kept a list.
Working out which is which is a real, ongoing, entry-by-entry job.
Where it sits on the spectrum
The value of the jubokko is that it anchors one end of a scale that only becomes visible once you have all four:
Nurarihyon — a genuinely old picture, given a completely fake job title (supreme commander of all yokai) in the twentieth century.
Gashadokuro — invented in 1966, by a named writer, and backdated onto a real Edo print that has nothing to do with it.
Kasa-obake — a genuinely old picture with no folklore whatsoever, famous anyway.
Jubokko — pure twentieth-century fiction, with scholarly consensus saying so.
Four different ways of being not-quite-what-you-were-told, and you cannot see any of them clearly without the others.
And the real version, which is bleaker
There is genuine Japanese belief about ground that has absorbed the dead. Blood-mounds and battlefield sites carry real prohibitions, and the folklore around such places is neither modern nor invented.
The jubokko is a beautiful modern fiction sitting next to a real and much quieter tradition: that some ground remembers what happened on it, and that you should be careful what you plant there.
Enjoy the tree. Date it correctly.
Field guide
At a glance
- Behavior
- A tree grown on an old battlefield, fed so long on the blood beneath that it thirsts — branches seize travelers and drink through tube-shaped twigs.
- Powers
- A magnificent image — and a twentieth-century one.
- Weaknesses
- Its provenance: the folklore corpora contain no possible origin, and scholars concluded it is almost certainly Mizuki's fiction.
- Oddities
- One of an estimated ~30 Mizuki inventions circulating unlabeled as ancient lore — the standing audit this bestiary works entry by entry.
- The honest counterpart exists: the willow that actually strangled someone in the folk record blames no tree — the horror went to the victim's ghost.
Overview
A tree grown on an old battlefield, fed so long on the blood beneath it that it thirsts: branches seize travelers, "changing its branches into the shape of a tube," and drink. Magnificent image — and, per the scholarship, invented in the 20th century, almost certainly by Shigeru Mizuki.
The provenance finding (unusually definitive)
- Yanagita and Iwao Hino's folklore corpora contain no yokai that could be the jubokko's origin [wikipedia-jubokko].
- The Tō Gakkai scholars' group concluded "there is no source of appearance for this yōkai tree and that it can be theorized that this yōkai is a fictional creature conceived by Shigeru Mizuki" [wikipedia-jubokko].
- Mizuki "did not specify which among the yōkai described in his work were his original creations" — an estimated ~30 invented yokai circulate unlabeled in his canon [wikipedia-jubokko]. That number is a standing audit: the Mizuki-invention count, worked entry by entry.
Why include it
The fake-lore dossier now has a spectrum: nurarihyon (old image, fake title), gashadokuro (1966, named inventor), kasa-obake (old image, no folklore ever), jubokko (pure 20th-c. fiction, scholarly consensus). Publishing this taxonomy — with genuine battlefield-tree folklore adjacent (the real jinmenju human-faced tree from Sekien [sekien-1781], and blood-soaked-ground beliefs) — is exactly what honest labeling makes possible.
Two-track labeling
The image

Citations
The record
- [wikipedia-jubokko]"Jubokko," Wikipedia (retrieved 2026-07-24), Tier C — reporting Yanagita/Hino/Tō Gakkai negative findings.modern reference English Wikipedia's article on this subject, as retrieved in 2026 — an aggregate starting point, not a primary source.All-source record
- [sekien-1781]per 02-HISTORICAL-CATALOGS.md.Edo, 1781 Sekien's third catalog (Konjaku Hyakki Shūi) — by now many plates are his own creations, presented deadpan beside folklore.All-source record
Where the evidence thins
Open questions
- The Mizuki-invention audit list (~30 candidates) as a project page.
- Genuine battlefield-ground beliefs (chi-zuka, blood mounds) for contrast.