Folklore, retold
The story as it is told
A retelling, not a citation. What follows is the story as the most widely circulated popular accounts tell it — folklore encyclopedias, translations, and the versions that have travelled furthest. It is synthesized rather than keyed line by line to the dated primary texts, and popular versions drift from what those texts actually say. The cited, source-by-source record begins further down this page, and where the two disagree, the record wins.
A rice paddy that nobody is looking after any more. The water gone stagnant, the weeds up, the banks slumping.
At night something comes up out of the mud. It's black with muck to the waist, it has one eye, and the hand it raises has three fingers. And it shouts, over and over, until the sun comes up:
Give back my field. Give back my field.
Who it is
The story Sekien attached to the picture in 1781 is the whole thing, and it doesn't need a monster to hurt.
An old man made that field. Not bought it — made it. Cleared it, levelled it, banked it, dug the channels, worked it for a lifetime. Building a paddy by hand is brutal, and he did it, and then he died and left it to his son.
The son let it go. Drank, or gambled, or simply couldn't be bothered — and in the versions that sting most, sold it out from under his father's bones.
So the old man comes back up through the mud of the field he built, and asks for it back, all night, every night, from a son who is not going to give it back.
It's an editorial cartoon
Being straight about provenance: there's little sign of an older folk tradition here. This looks like Sekien's own authorship — a picture with a moral caption, aimed at the landowning readership of Edo.
Which makes it something more interesting than a monster. It's a political cartoon about land stewardship, wearing a ghost's face.
And the message is economic, not supernatural. A field is stored labour. What the son inherited wasn't an asset, it was decades of somebody's back, and letting it silt up is a form of desecration serious enough to raise the dead.
Japanese folklore keeps a small set of these — the rat-swarm that comes for institutional injustice, the upside-down pillar that curses a house for a carpenter's slighted craft. Duty-to-property yokai. The dorotabō is their agricultural member.
The three fingers are conventionally read as the three Buddhist poisons — greed, anger, and ignorance, the vices that lost the field. It's a reading repeated almost everywhere, though it's worth knowing it's an interpretation rather than something Sekien spelled out.
It got louder
One thing the eighteenth century couldn't have planned.
Japan's countryside is emptying. There are hundreds of thousands of hectares of abandoned farmland across the country — fields that families worked for generations, going back to reed and weed because the children moved to the cities and nobody is left to farm them. There's a Japanese word for it, and there are government programmes about it.
Which means that a two-hundred-and-fifty-year-old cartoon about a neglected paddy now describes a national condition, and the cry coming out of the mud reads considerably less like a ghost story than it used to.
Field guide
At a glance
- Behavior
- Rises at night from the mud of a neglected rice paddy — one-eyed, three-fingered, black with muck — crying "Return my field!" until dawn.
- Powers
- The cry, and nothing else; agricultural grief needs no arsenal.
- Weaknesses
- Presumably, farming the field again.
- Oddities
- Largely Sekien's authorship: an Edo editorial cartoon about squandered patrimony wearing a ghost's face.
- The three fingers are conventionally read as the Buddhist three poisons — greed, anger, ignorance — the vices that lost the field.
- Rural depopulation has given the cry a modern echo the 1781 caption couldn't have planned.
Overview
From the mud of a neglected rice paddy, at night, rises a one-eyed, three-fingered figure, black with muck, crying "Return my field! Return my field!" until dawn. The dorotabō is agricultural grief: the old man who broke his body making a field, watching from death as a wastrel heir lets it drown in weeds — or sells it out from under his bones.
The Sekien caption (1781)
Sekien's plate and text tell the whole story: a diligent old man's field, inherited and neglected/sold by a dissolute heir; the former owner rises from the mud demanding it back [sekien-1781]. Like mokumokuren, this is largely Sekien's authorship — an Edo editorial cartoon about land stewardship wearing a ghost's face. The three fingers are conventionally read as the Buddhist three poisons (greed, anger, ignorance) — the vices that lost the field — a reading widely repeated, still awaiting caption-level confirmation.
Function
The moral is economic: fields are ancestors' labor, and squandering patrimony is a haunting offense. Alongside tesso (institutional injustice) and sakabashira (craft violation), the dorotabō rounds out a set of property-and-duty yokai.
Two-track labeling
The image


Citations
The record
- [sekien-1781]per 02-HISTORICAL-CATALOGS.md; the caption is the primary source.Edo, 1781 Sekien's third catalog (Konjaku Hyakki Shūi) — by now many plates are his own creations, presented deadpan beside folklore.All-source record
Where the evidence thins
Open questions
- Sekien's caption text verbatim (Japandemonium, Tier B).
- Any pre-Sekien field-revenant folklore at all?
- The three-poisons reading's earliest attribution.